These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16524004)

  • 41. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
    Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adaptive changes between cue abstraction and exemplar memory in a multiple-cue judgment task with continuous cues.
    Karlsson L; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 18229487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An ERP study of multidimensional source retrieval in depression.
    Barrick EM; Dillon DG
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():176-191. PubMed ID: 29305874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Kishiyama MM; Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1045-51. PubMed ID: 14704019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue.
    Schreiber TA; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):869-83. PubMed ID: 9796223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: evidence for distinct mnemonic processes.
    Wagner AD; Gabrieli JD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Apr; 98(2-3):211-30. PubMed ID: 9621831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recollection and familiarity exhibit dissociable similarity gradients: a test of the complementary learning systems model.
    Elfman KW; Yonelinas AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):876-92. PubMed ID: 25390205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):747-63. PubMed ID: 9421560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the sensitivity of event-related fields to recollection and familiarity.
    Evans LH; Wilding EL
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():33-39. PubMed ID: 30114569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of retrieval cues on visual preferences and memory in infancy: evidence for a four-phase attention function.
    Bahrick LE; Hernandez-Reif M; Pickens JN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 9344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploring the mental representation underlying familiarity assessment.
    Dopkins S; Sargent J; Ngo CT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 23046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hypermnesia: the role of multiple retrieval cues.
    Otani H; Widner RL; Whiteman HL; St Louis JP
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):928-34. PubMed ID: 10540821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does this ring a bell? Music-cued retrieval of semantic knowledge and metamemory judgments.
    Zuckerman M; Levy DA; Tibon R; Reggev N; Maril A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 24(11):2155-70. PubMed ID: 22816368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis.
    McElree B; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 May; 25(3):563-82. PubMed ID: 10368927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.