These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16524016)

  • 1. A dissociation between causal judgment and outcome recall.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Gan CY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):950-4. PubMed ID: 16524016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dissociation between causal judgement and the ease with which a cause is categorized with its effect.
    Mitchell CJ; Livesey E; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):400-17. PubMed ID: 17366308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competition between multiple causes of a single outcome in causal reasoning.
    Darredeau C; Baetu I; Baker AG; Murphy RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 19159158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Super-learning of causal judgements.
    Aitken MR; Larkin MJ; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Feb; 53(1):59-81. PubMed ID: 10718060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological difference between the representations of causal judgment and associative judgment in semantic memory.
    Chen Q; Liang X; Lei Y; Li H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():176-84. PubMed ID: 25813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment.
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1138-47. PubMed ID: 12507378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the interaction of direct and indirect relation on memory judgments and retrieval.
    Maxwell NP; Buchanan EM
    Cogn Process; 2020 Feb; 21(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31586278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of domain-specific beliefs on decisions and causal judgments.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M; Maldonado A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24076330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue competition effects in human causal learning.
    Vogel EH; Glynn JY; Wagner AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2327-50. PubMed ID: 25777980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferring causality assessments from predictive responses: cue interaction without cue competition.
    Winman A; Gredebäck G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 16556555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
    Hertzog C; Dunlosky J; Robinson AE; Kidder DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 12549580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The roles of cue and target familiarity in making feeling of knowing judgments.
    Leibert TW; Nelson DL
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 9624703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.