These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16524016)

  • 21. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
    Macho S; Burkart J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.
    Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):759-83. PubMed ID: 17638505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: causal powers versus regularity-based accounts.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 7731368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgment dissociation theory: an analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning.
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):419-34. PubMed ID: 13678376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The special status of actions in causal reasoning in rats.
    Leising KJ; Wong J; Waldmann MR; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):514-27. PubMed ID: 18729713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.
    Waldmann MR; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 1534834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Collaboration in associative recognition memory: using recalled information to defend "new" judgments.
    Clark SE; Abbe A; Larson RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17087582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extinction in human learning and memory.
    Scully AL; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 18609395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment.
    Miller RR; Matute H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Dec; 125(4):370-86. PubMed ID: 8945788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing the deductive inferential account of blocking in causal learning.
    Livesey EJ; Greenaway JK; Schubert S; Thorwart A
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1120-1132. PubMed ID: 30912035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.