These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16524182)

  • 21. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements.
    Braun S; Bantleon HP; Hnat WP; Freudenthaler JW; Marcotte MR; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8526297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Three-dimensional cephalometry: applications in clinical practice and research].
    Faure J; Oueiss A; Marchal-Sixou C; Braga J; Treil J
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Mar; 79(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 18364213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The application of Kvaal's dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs.
    Bosmans N; Ann P; Aly M; Willems G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):208-12. PubMed ID: 16139112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retromolar space analysis in relation to selected linear and angular measurements for an Iraqi sample.
    Uthman AT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 17703969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
    van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Possiblities of craniofacial identification from incomplete and damaged skulls].
    Fitsezheva NV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 18589667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical canine dental radiography.
    Bannon KM
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2013 May; 43(3):507-532. PubMed ID: 23643019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes.
    Forrest AS
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():24-32. PubMed ID: 22376094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern.
    Akcam MO; Altiok T; Ozdiler E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12594424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Embryology and Anatomy of the Jaw and Dentition.
    Zohrabian VM; Poon CS; Abrahams JJ
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2015 Oct; 36(5):397-406. PubMed ID: 26589693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An effective dental shape extraction algorithm using contour information and matching by Mahalanobis distance.
    Pushparaj V; Gurunathan U; Arumugam B
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Apr; 26(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 22695751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital imaging in dentistry.
    Essen SD
    Todays FDA; 2011; 23(6):62-8. PubMed ID: 22132658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A roentgenocephalometric study of the craniofacial relations in children with primary dentition].
    Suhr CH
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1984 Nov; 22(11):947-51. PubMed ID: 6597238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative characteristics of angulometric parameters of teeth and dentitions in terms of personal identification].
    Pashinian GA; Romodanovskiĭ PO; Arutiunov SD; Beleva EV; Eiubov UG
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2006; 49(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 17191721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.