121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16524327)
1. Acetabular cup geometry and bone-implant interference have more influence on initial periprosthetic joint space than joint loading and surgical cup insertion.
Ong KL; Lehman J; Notz WI; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16524327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust design for acetabular cup stability accounting for patient and surgical variability.
Ong KL; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031001. PubMed ID: 18532850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The potential for bone loss in acetabular structures following THA.
Manley MT; Ong KL; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():246-53. PubMed ID: 17006368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty.
Bevill SL; Bevill GR; Penmetsa JR; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2365-74. PubMed ID: 16214484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups.
Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 25384445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.
Bouchard SM; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 16488227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Initial stability of press-fit acetabular cups--an in-vitro study].
Wetzel R; Simnacher M; Scheller G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Dec; 50(12):400-3. PubMed ID: 16429943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup.
Hsu JT; Chang CH; An KN; Zobitz ME; Phimolsarnti R; Hugate RR; Lai KA
Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 16947050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Problematic sites of third body embedment in polyethylene for total hip wear acceleration.
Lundberg HJ; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1208-16. PubMed ID: 15894322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel acetabular alignment guide for THR using selective anatomic landmarks on the pelvis.
DeChenne CL; Jayaram U; Lovell T; Dong N; Cusick M
J Biomech; 2005 Sep; 38(9):1902-8. PubMed ID: 16023479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational assessment of press-fit acetabular implant fixation: the effect of implant design, interference fit, bone quality, and frictional properties.
Janssen D; Zwartelé RE; Doets HC; Verdonschot N
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20225458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement.
Zivkovic I; Gonzalez M; Amirouche F
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Apr; 132(4):041008. PubMed ID: 20387971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D non-linear analysis of the acetabular construct following impaction grafting.
Phillips AT; Pankaj P; Howie CR; Usmani AS; Simpson AH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Jun; 9(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 16880163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
