718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16525258)
1. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience.
Nelson JA; Guo Y; Sonnad SS; Low DW; Kovach SJ; Wu LC; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 21042098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
Vyas RM; Dickinson BP; Fastekjian JH; Watson JP; DaLio AL; Crisera CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
Krishnan NM; Purnell C; Nahabedian MY; Freed GL; Nigriny JF; Rosen JM; Rosson GD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):948-958. PubMed ID: 25811560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Schaverien MV; Perks AG; McCulley SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 17720644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.
Andrades P; Fix RJ; Danilla S; Howell RE; Campbell WJ; De la Torre J; Vasconez LO
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 May; 60(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18434832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction].
Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
