These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526134)

  • 1. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe.
    Solomon D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion in America.
    Shostak AB
    Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
    Schirmer JT
    Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion.
    Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Worst choice: why we'd be better off without Roe.
    Rosen J
    New Repub; 2003 Feb; 228(7):15-6, 18. PubMed ID: 12769107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate.
    America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go.
    Halloran L
    US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.