These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

926 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526306)

  • 1. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.
    Stolar MH
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Types of studies, power of study and choice of test].
    Hren D; Lukić KI
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():47-62. PubMed ID: 16526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basic concepts of statistical analysis for surgical research.
    Cassidy LD
    J Surg Res; 2005 Oct; 128(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16140341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The choice of statistical tests.
    Schneider B
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1991 Sep; 41(9):869-84. PubMed ID: 1796913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.
    Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S
    CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7804919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Characteristics of categorical data analysis].
    Zuvić-Butorac M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():63-79. PubMed ID: 16526308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Choice of method for statistical analysis of quantitative data obtained from toxicological studies--toxicological data].
    Kobayashi K; Ohori K; Kobayashi M; Takeuchi H
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1997 May; 39(3):86-92. PubMed ID: 9211592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the two sample t tests.
    Foster SD; Gerald KB
    Nurse Anesth; 1990 Mar; 1(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2285714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the power of some binomial modifications of the Bonferroni multiple test.
    Teriokhin AT; de Meeûs T; Guégan JF
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2007; 68(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 18038646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three p-value consistent procedures for multiple comparisons with a control in direction-mixed families.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Holland B; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4253-72. PubMed ID: 17342699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weighing the results of differing 'low dose' studies of the mouse prostate by Nagel, Cagen, and Ashby: quantification of experimental power and statistical results.
    Owens JW; Chaney JG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Nov; 43(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16140446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.