241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526308)
1. [Characteristics of categorical data analysis].
Zuvić-Butorac M
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():63-79. PubMed ID: 16526308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mixed categorical data in 2 x K contingency tables.
Gautam S
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1471-84. PubMed ID: 12185897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
Osborn JF
Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Types of variables and distributions].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():17-35. PubMed ID: 16526305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2 X 2 tables.
Brown GW
Am J Dis Child; 1985 Apr; 139(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 3883750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A review of statistical analysis methods in measurement data].
Cai Y
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15269858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Basic concepts of statistical analysis for surgical research.
Cassidy LD
J Surg Res; 2005 Oct; 128(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16140341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Types of studies, power of study and choice of test].
Hren D; Lukić KI
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():47-62. PubMed ID: 16526307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
Strickland PA; Lu SE
Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk and odds--how to calculate with events].
Malmquist J
Lakartidningen; 2002 Feb; 99(8):751-3, 756. PubMed ID: 11894612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [IV: Significance tests -- when to apply which one?].
Krummenauer F
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Nov; 219(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 12494375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of appropriate and inappropriate presentation and analysis methods of ordered categorical data in the veterinary dermatology literature from January 2003 to June 2006.
Plant JD; Giovanini JN; Villarroel A
Vet Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 18(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 17610492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical inference on categorical variables.
Perkins SM
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():73-88. PubMed ID: 18450046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research.
Jakobsson U
Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Dec; 18(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 15598252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Percentaging" contingency tables: It really does matter how you do it.
Knapp TR
Res Nurs Health; 2015 Aug; 38(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 25990211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
Zou GY
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of correlated data in occupational medicine: examples with binary data].
Biggeri A; Zocchetti C
Med Lav; 1997; 88(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 9229675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
