These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526308)

  • 41. An analysis of clustered categorical data--application in dental health.
    Das K; Chattopadhyay AK
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(18):2895-910. PubMed ID: 15344193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Statistics in review Part I: graphics, data summary and linear models.
    Moran JL; Solomon PJ
    Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Mar; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 17352672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Kappa coefficients in medical research.
    Chmura Kraemer H; Periyakoil VS; Noda A
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(14):2109-29. PubMed ID: 12111890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Appropriate application of statistical analysis method in medical science and technology articles].
    Gou L; Yu J; Yang Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 19(11):925-7. PubMed ID: 16334245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Parallel sets: interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data.
    Kosara R; Bendix F; Hauser H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(4):558-68. PubMed ID: 16805264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Proportions, odds, and risk.
    Sistrom CL; Garvan CW
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 14695382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Test for additive interaction in proportional hazards models.
    Li R; Chambless L
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 17(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 17320789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of estimation methods on making trait-level inferences from ordered categorical items for assessing psychopathology.
    Dumenci L; Achenbach TM
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18315399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analysis of paired Likert data: how to evaluate change and preference questions.
    Roberson PK; Shema SJ; Mundfrom DJ; Holmes TM
    Fam Med; 1995; 27(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8582561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Beyond logistic regression: structural equations modelling for binary variables and its application to investigating unobserved confounders.
    Kupek E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():13. PubMed ID: 16539711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Analyzing multivariate flow cytometric data in aquatic sciences.
    Demers S; Kim J; Legendre P; Legendre L
    Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 1576894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Risk factors for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in asphyxiated newborn infants.
    Futrakul S; Praisuwanna P; Thaitumyanon P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Mar; 89(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16696415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Multiple comparisons in categorical data analysis].
    Cao R; Qian J; Chen PY
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jan; 30(1):118-20. PubMed ID: 20117999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk.
    Simon SD
    J Androl; 2001; 22(4):533-6. PubMed ID: 11451349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differentiating categorical and dimensional data with taxometric analysis: are two variables better than none?
    Ruscio J; Walters GD
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Jun; 23(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 21443362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Tests and estimates of the association in case-control studies: analysis of 2 x 2 and k x 2 x 2 tables].
    Colonna M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(4):359-68. PubMed ID: 8085052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.