492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526310)
21. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.
Marais BJ; Gie RP; Hesseling AC; Schaaf HS; Lombard C; Enarson DA; Beyers N
Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1350-9. PubMed ID: 17079536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index.
Hilden J; Glasziou P
Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):969-86. PubMed ID: 8783436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [All that neurologist would like to know about sensitivity, specificity and predictive values].
Gomez de la Camara A
Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():11-8. PubMed ID: 14669103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of the predictive value model in the analysis of test effectiveness.
Galen RS
Clin Lab Med; 1982 Dec; 2(4):685-99. PubMed ID: 7160151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the clinical trunk muscle endurance tests in low back pain.
Arab AM; Salavati M; Ebrahimi I; Ebrahim Mousavi M
Clin Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 21(7):640-7. PubMed ID: 17702706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
Bizios D; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical criteria for identifying systolic and diastolic heart failure: cross-sectional study.
Maestre A; Gil V; Gallego J; Aznar J; Mora A; Martín-Hidalgo A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 19239582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
Eusebi P
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
Gilchrist JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of physical examination in the diagnosis of hypothyroidism: a cross-sectional, double-blind study.
Indra R; Patil SS; Joshi R; Pai M; Kalantri SP
J Postgrad Med; 2004; 50(1):7-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 15047991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of diagnostic procedures].
Strnad L; Kruparzh V; Ulybin B
Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1989; 32(1):9-29. PubMed ID: 2678419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 13C-methacetin-breath test compared to also noninvasive biochemical blood tests in predicting hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C.
Dinesen L; Caspary WF; Chapman RW; Dietrich CF; Sarrazin C; Braden B
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):743-8. PubMed ID: 18339592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum tumor markers, and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutations for pancreatic cancer.
Wu X; Lu XH; Xu T; Qian JM; Zhao P; Guo XZ; Yang XO; Jiang WJ
Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16808798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
