These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16526506)
1. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temperature-based extrinsic reproductive isolation in two species of Drosophila. Matute DR; Novak CJ; Coyne JA Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):595-612. PubMed ID: 19087181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Coyne JA; Kim SY; Chang AS; Lachaise D; Elwyn S Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2424-34. PubMed ID: 12583583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrinsic reproductive isolation between two sister species of Drosophila. Matute DR; Coyne JA Evolution; 2010 Apr; 64(4):903-20. PubMed ID: 19891626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges. Chang AS Evolution; 2004 Apr; 58(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 15154554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis. Jennings JH; Etges WJ Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila. Llopart A; Lachaise D; Coyne JA Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2602-7. PubMed ID: 16526507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone. Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Mas F; Jallon JM J Chem Ecol; 2005 Nov; 31(11):2747-52. PubMed ID: 16132336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Llopart A; Elwyn S; Lachaise D; Coyne JA Evolution; 2002 Nov; 56(11):2262-77. PubMed ID: 12487356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex-ratio and mating propensity in Drosophila biarmipes. Singh BN; Pandey MB Indian J Exp Biol; 1994 Jul; 32(7):482-5. PubMed ID: 7959925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba. Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The genetic basis of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to mating preference. Moehring AJ; Llopart A; Elwyn S; Coyne JA; Mackay TF Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):215-23. PubMed ID: 16510787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Kim SY; Llopart A Genet Res; 2004 Aug; 84(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 15663255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noisy neighbors can hamper the evolution of reproductive isolation by reinforcing selection. Matute DR Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):253-69. PubMed ID: 25616143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]