684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16527562)
1. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi.
Pearle MS; Nadler R; Bercowsky E; Chen C; Dunn M; Figenshau RS; Hoenig DM; McDougall EM; Mutz J; Nakada SY; Shalhav AL; Sundaram C; Wolf JS; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1255-60. PubMed ID: 11547053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.
Nikoobakht MR; Emamzadeh A; Abedi AR; Moradi K; Mehrsai A
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18270943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?
El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Sheir KZ
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2059-62; discussion 2062. PubMed ID: 17070256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Chen YT; Chen J; Wong WY; Yang SS; Hsieh CH; Wang CC
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1977-80. PubMed ID: 11956421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Madbouly K; El-Tiraifi AM; Seida M; El-Faqih SR; Atassi R; Talic RF
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 15592053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
