These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16528855)
1. Dobson v. Dobson: tort liability for expectant mothers? Foley T Sask Law Rev; 1998; 61(1):177-98. PubMed ID: 16528855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal-fetal relationship. The courts and social policy. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 8463752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A maternal duty to protect fetal health? Weinberg SR Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts. Kim RH Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health. Cook M Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stallman v. Youngquist. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():355-61. PubMed ID: 12041248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal duties toward the unborn? Soundings from the law of tort. Scott R Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 11787500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life. Shah MK Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence. Roden GJ St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canada upholds rights of pregnant women. Kondro W Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9174):232. PubMed ID: 11657346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The "Seymour Report" on Fetal Welfare and the Law in Australia. Marks LA E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E2. PubMed ID: 16900612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far? Trindel RM Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Delicate balance: the emerging issue of maternal-fetal conflict. Allegretti J America (NY); 1991 Mar; 164(8):238-9,249-50. PubMed ID: 16144134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosecuting pregnant addicts for dealing to the unborn. Barrett K Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 12186069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The relevance of illegality. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1544795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]