These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16530101)

  • 1. Manufacture and acoustical characterisation of a high-frequency contrast agent for targeting applications.
    Moran CM; Ross JA; Cunningham C; Butler M; Anderson T; Newby D; Fox KA; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 16530101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.
    Moran CM; Watson RJ; Fox KA; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 12113791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
    Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of frequency and power of ultrasound on the size reduction of liposome.
    Yamaguchi T; Nomura M; Matsuoka T; Koda S
    Chem Phys Lipids; 2009 Jul; 160(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19397902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical relevance of pressure-dependent scattering at low acoustic pressures.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 17845809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-agent-enhanced ultrasound thermal ablation.
    Tung YS; Liu HL; Wu CC; Ju KC; Chen WS; Lin WL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1103-10. PubMed ID: 16829324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Echogenic liposome compositions for increased retention of ultrasound reflectivity at physiologic temperature.
    Buchanan KD; Huang S; Kim H; Macdonald RC; McPherson DD
    J Pharm Sci; 2008 Jun; 97(6):2242-9. PubMed ID: 17894368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic radio-frequency spectrum analysis of normal brain tissue.
    Strowitzki M; Brand S; Jenderka KV
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 17316962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: linear properties (part I).
    Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19427099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
    Yeh CK; Su SY
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SURF imaging for contrast agent detection.
    Hansen R; Angelsen BA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Feb; 56(2):280-90. PubMed ID: 19251515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
    McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel tissue mimicking materials for high frequency breast ultrasound phantoms.
    Cannon LM; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):122-35. PubMed ID: 21084158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating perfluorohexane particles with high-frequency ultrasound.
    Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Cheung K; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 16364799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound backscatter at 30 MHz from human blood: influence of rouleau size affected by blood modification and shear rate.
    van der Heiden MS; de Kroon MG; Bom N; Borst C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 8571469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
    Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High frequency ultrasound tissue characterization and acoustic microscopy of intracellular changes.
    Brand S; Weiss EC; Lemor RM; Kolios MC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1396-407. PubMed ID: 18439747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Dollet B; van der Meer SM; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1465-73. PubMed ID: 18450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principles and devices.
    Kopchok GE; Donayre CE; White RA
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2006 Sep; 19(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 16996413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.