317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16530267)
1. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
Krauss DA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
Zonana H
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
Perry C
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusting risk of recidivism: do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Krauss DA
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):731-50. PubMed ID: 15386558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
Faigman DL; Monahan J
Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
Lally SJ
J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Congressional action to amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702: a mischievous attempt to codify Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Farrell NS
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):523-51. PubMed ID: 9212529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
Brakel SJ; Gonzalez ER; Cavanaugh JL
Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
Davies J
Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The mental state at the time of the offense measure: its validation and admissibility under Daubert.
Rogers R; Shuman DW
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):23-8; discussion 29-32. PubMed ID: 10774838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
