These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532545)

  • 1. NIH announces pilot effort to shorten peer review cycle of research applications.
    J Investig Med; 2006 Mar; 54(2):52. PubMed ID: 16532545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH goes back to college for peer review.
    Dolgin E
    Nat Med; 2010 Feb; 16(2):143. PubMed ID: 20134456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review at NIH.
    Osthus RC
    Physiologist; 2007 Oct; 50(5):185, 187. PubMed ID: 17990627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH weighs peer review changes.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Feb; 134(2):380. PubMed ID: 18242202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cautious welcome to NIH peer review reforms.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):269. PubMed ID: 8183356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
    Cozzarelli NR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overhaul of peer review at NIH.
    Fusaro RM
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1649. PubMed ID: 10560706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores.
    PLOS ONE Staff
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0132202. PubMed ID: 26121031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
    Scarpa T
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All parties on edge as NIH delays open-access briefing.
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):182. PubMed ID: 15662377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research policy. NIH weighs big changes in peer review.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5857):1708-9. PubMed ID: 18079373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1234. PubMed ID: 11509695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH peer review: time for some changes.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH panel to monitor peer review in action.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6531):438. PubMed ID: 7777040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa.
    Scarpa T
    Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.