166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532611)
1. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model.
Shultz TR; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Norman TL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16532611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: an in-vitro model.
Norman TL; Ackerman ES; Smith TS; Gruen TA; Yates AJ; Blaha JD; Kish VL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 16532612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study.
Russell RD; Huo MH; Rodrigues DC; Kosmopoulos V
Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 27434281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of bone material properties on the initial stability of a cementless hip stem: a finite element study.
Wong AS; New AM; Isaacs G; Taylor M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Jul; 219(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 16050217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A
Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment.
Ramamurti BS; Orr TE; Bragdon CR; Lowenstein JD; Jasty M; Harris WH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Aug; 36(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 9261690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19913227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Numerical simulation of the insertion process of an uncemented hip prosthesis in order to evaluate the influence of residual stress and contact distribution on the stem initial stability.
Monea AG; Pastrav LC; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 22548243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis on mechanical behavior of the bone remodeling and bone integration between the bone-implant interface after hip replacement].
Li YJ; Zhang LC; Zhang MC; Yang GJ; Lin RX; Cai CY; Zhong SZ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Apr; 27(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 25029841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A finite element study of the effect of diametral interface gaps on the contact areas and pressures in uncemented cylindrical femoral total hip components.
Harrigan TP; Harris WH
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 2026636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design.
Andreykiv A; Prendergast PJ; van Keulen F; Swieszkowski W; Rozing PM
J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 15797584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the stiffness of bone defect implants on the mechanical conditions at the interface--a finite element analysis with contact.
Simon U; Augat P; Ignatius A; Claes L
J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1079-86. PubMed ID: 12831732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element stress and strain analysis of a transfemoral osseointegration implant.
Xu W; Xu DH; Crocombe AD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Aug; 220(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 16961185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
