These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An analytically solvable model for biomechanical response of the cornea to refractive surgery. Djotyan GP; Kurtz RM; Fernández DC; Juhasz T J Biomech Eng; 2001 Oct; 123(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 11601729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements. Svedberg H; Chen E; Hamberg-Nyström H Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 243(12):1218-20. PubMed ID: 16003513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences between real and predicted corneal shapes after aspherical corneal ablation. Anera RG; Villa C; Jiménez JR; Gutiérrez R; del Barco LJ Appl Opt; 2005 Jul; 44(21):4528-32. PubMed ID: 16047903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of real and computer-simulated outcomes of LASIK refractive surgery. Cano D; Barbero S; Marcos S J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Jun; 21(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 15191172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower- and higher-order aberrations predicted by an optomechanical model of arcuate keratotomy for astigmatism. Navarro R; Palos F; Lanchares E; Calvo B; Cristóbal JA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 19101439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. Faucher A; Grégoire J; Blondeau P J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997; 23(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 9292664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical zone diameters for photorefractive corneal surgery. Roberts CW; Koester CJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 34(7):2275-81. PubMed ID: 8505209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for correction of high myopia. Pallikaris IG; Siganos DS J Refract Corneal Surg; 1994; 10(5):498-510. PubMed ID: 7530099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of ablation efficiency reduction on post-surgery corneal asphericity: simulation of the laser refractive surgery with a flying spot laser beam. Kwon Y; Choi M; Bott S Opt Express; 2008 Aug; 16(16):11808-21. PubMed ID: 18679453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometrical analysis of the loss of ablation efficiency at non-normal incidence. Arba-Mosquera S; de Ortueta D Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(6):3877-95. PubMed ID: 18542485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of the Ocular Response Analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery. Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Yeung I; Pan X; Roberts C Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 19321376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Küchle M Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 10201589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The AS biometry technique--a novel technique to aid accurate intraocular lens power calculation after corneal laser refractive surgery. Sambare C; Naroo S; Shah S; Sharma A Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 May; 29(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 16600667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical response of the cornea to phototherapeutic keratectomy when treated as a fluid-filled porous material. Katsube N; Wang R; Okuma E; Roberts C J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(5):S593-7. PubMed ID: 12361164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]