These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532809)
1. [Application study of JPEG2000 image compression in nuclear medicine]. Zhou L; Su X; Qin W; Li L; Kuang A; Mo T Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 23(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 16532809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Objective and quantitative study on the effect of lossy JPEG2000 compression of nuclear medicine image]. Zhou L; Su X; Kuang A; Li L; Chai L Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):1027-30, 1044. PubMed ID: 18027689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures. McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses. Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images. Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative visually lossless compression ratio determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms. Georgiev VT; Karahaliou AN; Skiadopoulos SG; Arikidis NS; Kazantzi AD; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI J Digit Imaging; 2013 Jun; 26(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 23065144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lossy compression in nuclear medicine images. Rebelo MS; Furuie SS; Munhoz AC; Moura L; Melo CP Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1993; ():824-8. PubMed ID: 8130593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images. Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Kim B; Seo J; Mantiuk R Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3218-26. PubMed ID: 19673221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy. Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images. Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lossless and lossy compression of quantitative phase images of red blood cells obtained by digital holographic imaging. Jaferzadeh K; Gholami S; Moon I Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(36):10409-10416. PubMed ID: 28059271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital image compression in dermatology: format comparison. Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C Telemed J E Health; 2008 Sep; 14(7):666-70. PubMed ID: 18817495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of image features in predicting visually lossless thresholds of JPEG2000 compressed body CT images: initial trial. Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Kang HS Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 23630311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images. Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C; Cannavò SP Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 23724923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]