187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532809)
1. [Application study of JPEG2000 image compression in nuclear medicine].
Zhou L; Su X; Qin W; Li L; Kuang A; Mo T
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 23(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 16532809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Objective and quantitative study on the effect of lossy JPEG2000 compression of nuclear medicine image].
Zhou L; Su X; Kuang A; Li L; Chai L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):1027-30, 1044. PubMed ID: 18027689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures.
McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.
Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative visually lossless compression ratio determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms.
Georgiev VT; Karahaliou AN; Skiadopoulos SG; Arikidis NS; Kazantzi AD; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Jun; 26(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 23065144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lossy compression in nuclear medicine images.
Rebelo MS; Furuie SS; Munhoz AC; Moura L; Melo CP
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1993; ():824-8. PubMed ID: 8130593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images.
Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Kim B; Seo J; Mantiuk R
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3218-26. PubMed ID: 19673221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lossless and lossy compression of quantitative phase images of red blood cells obtained by digital holographic imaging.
Jaferzadeh K; Gholami S; Moon I
Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(36):10409-10416. PubMed ID: 28059271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital image compression in dermatology: format comparison.
Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C
Telemed J E Health; 2008 Sep; 14(7):666-70. PubMed ID: 18817495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of image features in predicting visually lossless thresholds of JPEG2000 compressed body CT images: initial trial.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Kang HS
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 23630311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images.
Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C; Cannavò SP
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 23724923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography.
Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
