These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532815)

  • 1. [Investigation in the dependency of stiffness of cancellous bone on apparent density--based on the combination model of rod-rod structure and perforated plate structure].
    Hou Y; Zhu X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 23(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 16532815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone tissue stiffness in the mandibular condyle is dependent on the direction and density of the cancellous structure.
    van Eijden TM; van Ruijven LJ; Giesen EB
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Dec; 75(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 15654494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology.
    Fyhrie DP; Carter DR
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(3):304-17. PubMed ID: 3734938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mechanobiology of cancellous bone structural adaptation.
    Jacobs CR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 10850827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A three-dimensional elastic plastic damage constitutive law for bone tissue.
    Garcia D; Zysset PK; Charlebois M; Curnier A
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Apr; 8(2):149-65. PubMed ID: 18398628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 19155014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the feasibility of implementing fractal paradigms to simulate cancellous bone structure.
    Haire TJ; Ganney PS; Langton CM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2001; 4(4):341-54. PubMed ID: 11328644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical variation of human cancellous bone mechanical properties in vitro.
    Hobatho MC; Rho JY; Ashman RB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():157-73. PubMed ID: 10168876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the mechanical characterization of compact bone structure using the homogenization theory.
    Aoubiza B; Crolet JM; Meunier A
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1539-47. PubMed ID: 8945652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Buckling of adaptive elastic bone-plate: theoretical and numerical investigation.
    Ramtani S; Abdi M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Jun; 3(4):200-8. PubMed ID: 15668767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model for prediction of bone stiffness using a mechanical approach of composite materials.
    Perreux DM; Johnson WS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 17655470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cancellous bone multiscale morphology-elasticity relationship.
    Agić A; Nikolić V; Mijović B
    Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):409-14. PubMed ID: 16848160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial orientation in bone samples and Young's modulus.
    Geraets WG; van Ruijven LJ; Verheij JG; van der Stelt PF; van Eijden TM
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2206-10. PubMed ID: 18539283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The micro-mechanics of cancellous bone. II. Determination of the elastic modulus of individual trabeculae by a buckling analysis.
    Runkle JC; Pugh J
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1975 Apr; 36(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 1201361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation.
    Diamant I; Shahar R; Masharawi Y; Gefen A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Mar; 22(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 17134802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of idealised unit cell cancellous structure based on morphological indices of cancellous bone.
    Kadir MR; Syahrom A; Ochsner A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 May; 48(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 20224954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain patterns during tensile, compressive, and shear fatigue of human cortical bone and implications for bone biomechanics.
    Winwood K; Zioupos P; Currey JD; Cotton JR; Taylor M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Nov; 79(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 16817209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.