432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16532888)
21. Equivalency study of histological responses to complete or partial pulpotomies in inflamed baboon immature first permanent molars.
Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):062-5. PubMed ID: 17624175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study.
Nagasiri R; Chitmongkolsuk S
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15674228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of Overlying Material on Final Setting of Biodentine ® in Primary Molar Pulpotomies.
Pham CL; Kratunova E; Marion I; da Fonseca MA; Alapati SB
Pediatr Dent; 2019 Mar; 41(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 30992113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars.
Caceda JH
J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18477438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars.
el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(4):238-42, 228. PubMed ID: 10529865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
Khinda VI; Grewal N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preservation of future options: restorative procedures on first permanent molars in children.
Radcliffe RM; Cullen CL
ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 2050869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time-dependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics.
Madarati A; Rekab MS; Watts DC; Qualtrough A
Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 19032641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Success of electrofulguration pulpotomies covered by zinc oxide and eugenol or calcium hydroxide: a clinical study.
Fishman SA; Udin RD; Good DL; Rodef F
Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 8897531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth.
Moretti AB; Sakai VT; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
Int Endod J; 2008 Jul; 41(7):547-55. PubMed ID: 18479381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Hutcheson C; Seale NS; McWhorter A; Kerins C; Wright J
Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 23265162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effectiveness of mandibular infiltration compared to mandibular block anesthesia in treating primary molars in children.
Oulis CJ; Vadiakas GP; Vasilopoulou A
Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 8857658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pulp response to ferric sulfate, diluted formocresol and IRM in pulpotomized primary baboon teeth.
Fuks AB; Eidelman E; Cleaton-Jones P; Michaeli Y
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 9328676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of glass ionomer temporary restorations on pulpal diagnosis and treatment outcomes in primary molars.
Coll JA; Campbell A; Chalmers NI
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 24290553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
