239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16533155)
1. Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review.
Dudek AZ; Arodz T; Gálvez J
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2006 Mar; 9(3):213-28. PubMed ID: 16533155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolutionary computation and QSAR research.
Aguiar-Pulido V; Gestal M; Cruz-Monteagudo M; Rabuñal JR; Dorado J; Munteanu CR
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2013 Jun; 9(2):206-25. PubMed ID: 23700999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening.
Tropsha A; Golbraikh A
Curr Pharm Des; 2007; 13(34):3494-504. PubMed ID: 18220786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual darwinian drug design: QSAR inverse problem, virtual combinatorial chemistry, and computational screening.
de Julian-Ortiz JV
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2001 May; 4(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 11375744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of topological descriptors in QSAR and drug design: history and new trends.
Gozalbes R; Doucet JP; Derouin F
Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord; 2002 Mar; 2(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 12462157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applications of 2D descriptors in drug design: a DRAGON tale.
Helguera AM; Combes RD; González MP; Cordeiro MN
Curr Top Med Chem; 2008; 8(18):1628-55. PubMed ID: 19075771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptors and their selection methods in QSAR analysis: paradigm for drug design.
Danishuddin ; Khan AU
Drug Discov Today; 2016 Aug; 21(8):1291-302. PubMed ID: 27326911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The great descriptor melting pot: mixing descriptors for the common good of QSAR models.
Tseng YJ; Hopfinger AJ; Esposito EX
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jan; 26(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 22200979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of P-glycoprotein substrates.
de Cerqueira Lima P; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao Y; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1245-54. PubMed ID: 16711744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QSAR and 3D-QSAR studies applied to compounds with anticonvulsant activity.
Garro Martinez JC; Vega-Hissi EG; Andrada MF; Estrada MR
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Jan; 10(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 25297377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and its application in rational drug design.
Yang GF; Huang X
Curr Pharm Des; 2006; 12(35):4601-11. PubMed ID: 17168765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual Combinatorial Chemistry and Pharmacological Screening: A Short Guide to Drug Design.
Suay-García B; Bueso-Bordils JI; Falcó A; Antón-Fos GM; Alemán-López PA
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35163543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QSAR in the pharmaceutical research setting: QSAR models for broad, large problems.
Sprous DG; Palmer RK; Swanson JT; Lawless M
Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(6):619-37. PubMed ID: 20337590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design.
Ebalunode JO; Zheng W; Tropsha A
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():111-33. PubMed ID: 20981521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variable selection methods in QSAR: an overview.
González MP; Terán C; Saíz-Urra L; Teijeira M
Curr Top Med Chem; 2008; 8(18):1606-27. PubMed ID: 19075770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review.
Adhikari C; Mishra BK
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2018; 14(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 28699497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Topological, Electronic, Geometrical, Constitutional and Quantum Chemical Based Descriptors in QSAR: mPGES-1 as a Case Study.
Gupta A; Kumar V; Aparoy P
Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(13):1075-1090. PubMed ID: 30027847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surrogate docking: structure-based virtual screening at high throughput speed.
Yoon S; Smellie A; Hartsough D; Filikov A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2005 Jul; 19(7):483-97. PubMed ID: 16292613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
