BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16533758)

  • 21. Can we trust cancer information on the Internet?--A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites.
    Ekman A; Hall P; Litton JE
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):765-72. PubMed ID: 16049816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Health care providers on the World Wide Web: quality of presentations of surgical departments in Germany.
    Stausberg J; Fuchs J; Hüsing J; Hirche H
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11583405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. E-oncology and health portals: instructions and standards for the evaluation, production organisation and use.
    Cognetti G; Cecere L
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2003 Dec; 22(4):677-86. PubMed ID: 15053314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet.
    Morr S; Shanti N; Carrer A; Kubeck J; Gerling MC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 20362253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the "information highway" led to better information provision?
    Nason GJ; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Noel J; Moore D; Kiely PJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1364-9. PubMed ID: 22772569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do the leading children's hospitals have quality web sites? A description of children's hospital web sites.
    Kind T; Wheeler KL; Robinson B; Cabana MD
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jun; 6(2):e20. PubMed ID: 15249269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
    Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of Internet information in pediatric otolaryngology: a comparison of three most referenced websites.
    Volsky PG; Baldassari CM; Mushti S; Derkay CS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1312-6. PubMed ID: 22770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Mathur S; Shanti N; Brkaric M; Sood V; Kubeck J; Paulino C; Merola AA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2695-700. PubMed ID: 16319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Oncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.
    Lawrentschuk N; Sasges D; Tasevski R; Abouassaly R; Scott AM; Davis ID
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 22146882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web.
    Pérez-López FR
    Maturitas; 2004 Dec; 49(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 15531123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the Quality of Patient-Orientated Information on Surgery for Crohn's Disease on the Internet.
    Yeung TM; Sacchi M; Mortensen NJ; Spinelli A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep; 58(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 26252847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the internet.
    Norum J
    J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E30. PubMed ID: 11772545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet.
    Grewal P; Williams B; Alagaratnam S; Neffendorf J; Soobrah R
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 56(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 22801107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of chronic pain websites.
    Washington TA; Fanciullo GJ; Sorensen JA; Baird JC
    Pain Med; 2008 Nov; 9(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 18346065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An evaluation of information on the internet about a new device: the cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Qureshi SA; Koehler SM; Lin JD; Bird J; Garcia RM; Hecht AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):881-3. PubMed ID: 21912306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.
    Berland GK; Elliott MN; Morales LS; Algazy JI; Kravitz RL; Broder MS; Kanouse DE; Muñoz JA; Puyol JA; Lara M; Watkins KE; Yang H; McGlynn EA
    JAMA; 2001 May 23-30; 285(20):2612-21. PubMed ID: 11368735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information.
    Magunacelaya MB; Glendor U
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-43. PubMed ID: 21635690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.