642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16534056)
1. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
Frisén L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Nevalainen J; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Vonthein R; Johnson CA; Schiefer U
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 246(9):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18563431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
Nowomiejska K; Wrobel-Dudzinska D; Ksiazek K; Ksiazek P; Rejdak K; Maciejewski R; Juenemann AG; Rejdak R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25444538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice.
Rowe FJ; Czanner G; Somerville T; Sood I; Sood D
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jan; 46(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 32564629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of static automated perimetry and semi-automated kinetic perimetry in patients with bilateral visible optic nerve head drusen.
Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zagorski Z; Zarnowski T
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 18721249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
Hasler S; Stürmer J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
