These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey. Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A J Hypertens; 2009 Feb; 27(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 19155785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer. Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 19417634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BpTRU(tm) blood pressure monitor for use in a physician's office. Allison C Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Aug; (86):1-4. PubMed ID: 16958188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of an automated blood pressure recording device, the BpTRU, to reduce the "white coat effect" in routine practice. Myers MG; Valdivieso MA Am J Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 16(6):494-7. PubMed ID: 12799100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic. Fonseca-Reyes S; Cervantes-Munguía R; de Alba-García JG; Parra-Carrillo JZ; López-Maldonado F; Montes-Casillas M Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 17890971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings. Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic. Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study. Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G; Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Myers MG; Godwin M; Dawes M; Kiss A; Tobe SW; Kaczorowski J Fam Pract; 2012 Aug; 29(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 22117083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]