570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16536188)
1. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Venturini D; Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16536188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Yap AU; Wong ML; Lim AC
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 10784332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
Ferraris F; Conti A
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
