These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16536192)

  • 1. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing.
    Joniot S; Salomon JP; Dejou J; Grégoire G
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16536192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish.
    Atabek D; Sillelioglu H; Olmez A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 20533638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
    Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials: an in vitro comparison.
    Rosen M; Grossman ES; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 11575115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES; Rosen M; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.