These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16536192)

  • 21. Surface roughness of three resin restorative materials after finishing and polishing.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Contardo L; Chiesa R; Di Lenarda R; Dorigo E
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Apr; 55(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 16618992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
    Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material.
    Warren DP; Colescott TD; Henson HA; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 12214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.
    Turssi CP; Saad JR; Duarte SL; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun; 13(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 11763949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites.
    Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 20225464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the effect of a home-bleaching agent on the surface characteristics of indirect esthetic restorative materials: part I--roughness.
    Torabi K; Rasaeipour S; Khaledi AA; Vojdani M; Ghodsi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 25307815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Ural C; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16872928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
    Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of resin composite materials in vitro.
    Neme AM; Wagner WC; Pink FE; Frazier KB
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):808-15. PubMed ID: 14653298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Lye KW; Sau CW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 9610323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials.
    Mohamed-Tahir MA; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 15470882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.