These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16536200)

  • 1. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hiltl O; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12216571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations.
    Chan DC; Browning WD; Frazier KB; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations.
    Müllejans R; Badawi MO; Raab WH; Lang H
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 12670066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of curing rate of resin composite on the bond strength to dentin.
    Benetti AR; Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17427823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.