These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16537116)

  • 1. The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.
    Leslie WD;
    Bone; 2006 Aug; 39(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16537116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoring.
    Leslie WD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2008 Feb; 23(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 17937536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.
    Leslie WD; Moayyeri A;
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(11):1673-80. PubMed ID: 16900302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which to use to evaluate change in BMD at follow-up: RMS-SD or RMS-%CV?
    Kiebzak GM; Morgan SL; Peace F
    J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 22154429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.
    Lodder MC; Lems WF; Ader HJ; Marthinsen AE; van Coeverden SC; Lips P; Netelenbos JC; Dijkmans BA; Roos JC
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Mar; 63(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 14962964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.
    El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating Lumbar Spine Least Significant Change for Fewer than Four Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
    Rosen H; Szalat A; Leslie WD
    J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101483. PubMed ID: 38479135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Frimeth J; Galiano E; Webster D
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 19932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size requirements for bone density precision assessments and effect on patient categorization: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Moayyeri A; Sadatsafavi M; Leslie WD;
    Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):679-84. PubMed ID: 17706478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "The least significant change on bone mineral density scan increased in patients with higher degrees of obesity".
    Dorilleau C; Kanagaratnam L; Charlot I; Hittinger A; Bertin E; Salmon JH; Geoffroy M
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2024 Apr; 36(1):98. PubMed ID: 38652346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rate of bone density change does not enhance fracture prediction in routine clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM;
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2012 Apr; 97(4):1211-8. PubMed ID: 22278427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is a fixed value for the least significant change appropriate?
    Nelson L; Gulenchyn KY; Atthey M; Webber CE
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 20171565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Change in Spine Bone Density from Different Numbers and Combinations of Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
    Szalat A; Rosen H; Leslie WD
    J Clin Densitom; 2024 Apr; 27(3):101493. PubMed ID: 38643731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women.
    Patel R; Blake GM; Rymer J; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10663361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discordantly high spinal bone mineral density values in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis.
    Pappou IP; Girardi FP; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Cammisa FP; Schneider R; Frelinghuysen P; Lane JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):1614-20. PubMed ID: 16778698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response rate of bone mineral density to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
    Gallagher JC; Rosen CJ; Chen P; Misurski DA; Marcus R
    Bone; 2006 Dec; 39(6):1268-75. PubMed ID: 16884968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.
    Ozdemir A; Uçar M
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term changes in bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients.
    Naylor KL; Garg AX; Hodsman AB; Rush DN; Leslie WD
    Transplantation; 2014 Dec; 98(12):1279-85. PubMed ID: 25050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.