These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1653786)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Stockman L; Roberts G; Pincus D; Pollack J; Marler J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 36(4):883-6. PubMed ID: 9542903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
    Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.
    St Germain G; Beauchesne D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2296-9. PubMed ID: 1939587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in Microbial Identification System accuracy for yeast identification depending on commercial source of Sabouraud dextrose agar.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2080-3. PubMed ID: 10325387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
    Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.
    Szabó Z; Tóth B; Kovács M; Kardos G; Maráz A; Rozgonyi F; Majoros L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 18322057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.
    Lin CC; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1987; 14(4):273-89. PubMed ID: 3308316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Sekhon AS; Padhye AA; Garg AK; Rae R
    Mycopathologia; 1992 Jul; 119(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1406902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.