92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16538536)
1. Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer.
Kauhava L; Immonen-Räihä P; Parvinen I; Holli K; Kronqvist P; Pylkkänen L; Helenius H; Kaljonen A; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Jul; 98(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 16538536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme.
Kauhava L; Immonen-Räihä P; Parvinen I; Helenius H; Kaljonen A; Räsänen O; Pylkkänen L; Klemi PJ
Eur J Public Health; 2004 Jun; 14(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15230496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.
Webb ML; Cady B; Michaelson JS; Bush DM; Calvillo KZ; Kopans DB; Smith BL
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2839-46. PubMed ID: 24018987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening.
Tabar L; Yen MF; Vitak B; Chen HH; Smith RA; Duffy SW
Lancet; 2003 Apr; 361(9367):1405-10. PubMed ID: 12727392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.
Tscheulin DK; Drevs F
Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19449159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women.
Barfar E; Rashidian A; Hosseini H; Nosratnejad S; Barooti E; Zendehdel K
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Apr; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 24724599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening halves the risk of breast cancer death: a case-referent study.
Paap E; Verbeek AL; Botterweck AA; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Imhof-Tas M; de Koning HJ; Otto SJ; de Munck L; van der Steen A; Holland R; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24713277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening by mammography in Norway. Is it cost-effective?
Norum J
Ann Oncol; 1999 Feb; 10(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10093689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Health economics analysis of breast cancer screening].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Gulácsi L; Pál M; Dózsa C
Magy Onkol; 2003; 47(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 12975661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku.
Parvinen I; Helenius H; Pylkkänen L; Anttila A; Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16569304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.
Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16434585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower recurrence risk through mammographic screening reduces breast cancer treatment costs.
Kauhava L; Immonen-Räihä P; Parvinen I; Holli K; Pylkkänen L; Kaljonen A; Helenius H; Kronqvist P; Klemi PJ
Breast; 2008 Dec; 17(6):550-4. PubMed ID: 18922695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Will early detection of breast cancer reduce the costs of treatment?
Salkeld G; Gerard K
Aust J Public Health; 1994 Dec; 18(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 7718652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
von Fournier D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
