BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16539387)

  • 1. Are target-family-privileged substructures truly privileged?
    Schnur DM; Hermsmeier MA; Tebben AJ
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(6):2000-9. PubMed ID: 16539387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors.
    Bondensgaard K; Ankersen M; Thøgersen H; Hansen BS; Wulff BS; Bywater RP
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):888-99. PubMed ID: 14761190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Klabunde T; Hessler G
    Chembiochem; 2002 Oct; 3(10):928-44. PubMed ID: 12362358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand-based approach to in silico pharmacology: nuclear receptor profiling.
    Mestres J; Martín-Couce L; Gregori-Puigjané E; Cases M; Boyer S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2725-36. PubMed ID: 17125212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies for designing GPCR-focused libraries and screening sets.
    Jimonet P; Jäger R
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 May; 7(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 15216936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures.
    Mason JS; Morize I; Menard PR; Cheney DL; Hulme C; Labaudiniere RF
    J Med Chem; 1999 Aug; 42(17):3251-64. PubMed ID: 10464012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of a gene family screening library targeting G-protein coupled receptors.
    Lamb ML; Bradley EK; Beaton G; Bondy SS; Castellino AJ; Gibbons PA; Suto MJ; Grootenhuis PD
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Sep; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 15331050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ligand identification for G-protein-coupled receptors: a lead generation perspective.
    Bleicher KH; Green LG; Martin RE; Rogers-Evans M
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2004 Jun; 8(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 15183327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family.
    Jacoby E; Bouhelal R; Gerspacher M; Seuwen K
    ChemMedChem; 2006 Aug; 1(8):761-82. PubMed ID: 16902930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. G-protein-coupled receptor-focused drug discovery using a target class platform approach.
    Heilker R; Wolff M; Tautermann CS; Bieler M
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Mar; 14(5-6):231-40. PubMed ID: 19121411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Substructure mining of GPCR ligands reveals activity-class specific functional groups in an unbiased manner.
    van der Horst E; Okuno Y; Bender A; IJzerman AP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):348-60. PubMed ID: 19434836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification and comparison of ligand-binding sites derived from grid-mapped knowledge-based potentials.
    Hoppe C; Steinbeck C; Wohlfahrt G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Mar; 24(5):328-40. PubMed ID: 16260161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracting sets of chemical substructures and protein domains governing drug-target interactions.
    Yamanishi Y; Pauwels E; Saigo H; Stoven V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 21506615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approaches to target class combinatorial library design.
    Schnur D; Beno BR; Good A; Tebben A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():355-78. PubMed ID: 15141121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for combinatorial and parallel library design.
    Schnur DM; Beno BR; Tebben AJ; Cavallaro C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 672():387-434. PubMed ID: 20838978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing performance of computational tools for combinatorial library design.
    Evensen E; Eksterowicz JE; Stanton RV; Oshiro C; Grootenhuis PD; Bradley EK
    J Med Chem; 2003 Nov; 46(24):5125-8. PubMed ID: 14613315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge-based design of target-focused libraries using protein-ligand interaction constraints.
    Deng Z; Chuaqui C; Singh J
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 16420036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding multiactivity substructures by mining databases of drug-like compounds.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):1037-50. PubMed ID: 12767163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Library of biphenyl privileged substructures using a safety-catch linker approach.
    Severinsen R; Bourne GT; Tran TT; Ankersen M; Begtrup M; Smythe ML
    J Comb Chem; 2008; 10(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 18462009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.