These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16539543)

  • 41. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults.
    Senna A; Abbenante D; Tremolizzo L; Campus G; Strohmenger L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17032444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the Divine Proportion in the facial profile of young females.
    Jahanbin A; Basafa M; Alizadeh Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 19075430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Oval Female Facial Shape--A Study in Beauty.
    Goodman GJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1375-83. PubMed ID: 26561957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Association of facial sagittal and vertical characteristics with facial aesthetics in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966.
    Krooks L; Pirttiniemi P; Tolvanen M; Kanavakis G; Lähdesmäki R; Silvola AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 30215708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiographic cephalometry of the facial profile.
    Carek V; Jerolimov V; Buković D; Baucić I; Radionov D
    Coll Antropol; 1997 Dec; 21(2):549-54. PubMed ID: 9439072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
    Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perception of Age, Attractiveness, and Tiredness After Isolated and Combined Facial Subunit Aging.
    Forte AJ; Andrew TW; Colasante C; Persing JA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):856-69. PubMed ID: 26408388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Role of Ideal Angles, Ratios, and Divine Proportions in Aesthetic Evaluation of Adolescents.
    Malkoc S; Fidancioglu A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26510875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Don't look back in anger: the rewarding value of a female face is discounted by an angry expression.
    Jaensch M; van den Hurk W; Dzhelyova M; Hahn AC; Perrett DI; Richards A; Smith ML
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2101-5. PubMed ID: 25314046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces.
    Rhee SC
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 28722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography.
    Nohadani N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 18209215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Facial beauty--establishing a universal standard.
    Jefferson Y
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2004; 15(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 15085778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.