These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16539553)

  • 21. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains.
    Yilmaz C; Korkmaz T; Demirköprülü H; Ergün G; Ozkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 17971115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.
    Sarikaya I; Güler AU
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 20379676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of a bleaching system on properties related to different ceramic surface textures.
    Zaki AA; Fahmy NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 19210611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.
    Wright MD; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E; Thompson GA; Runyan DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 15523338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of enamel surface roughness and color alteration after bracket debonding and polishing with 2 systems: A split-mouth clinical trial.
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Souza Costa AC; Gurgel JA; Salvatore Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Nov; 160(5):686-694. PubMed ID: 34332796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of extraoral porcelain polishing sequences on surface roughness and color of feldspathic porcelain.
    Yuzugullu B; Celik C; Erkut S; Ozcelik TB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 20095196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial enamel wear of glazed and polished leucite-based porcelains with different fusing temperatures.
    Adachi LK; Saiki M; de Campos TN; Adachi EM; Shinkai RS
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 19903616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives.
    Trakyali G; Ozdemir FI; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 19460855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bond strength of a composite luting agent to alumina ceramic surfaces.
    Derand T; Molin M; Kvam K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Aug; 64(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 16829498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of gloss changes of two denture acrylic resin materials in four different beverages.
    Keyf F; Etikan I
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 15209229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
    Webb BJ; Koch J; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
    J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.
    Butler CJ; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Thompson GA; Runyan DA; Anthony von Fraunhofer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.