These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16539553)

  • 41. Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing.
    Ward MT; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(3):106-10. PubMed ID: 7479187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets.
    Harari D; Shapira-Davis S; Gillis I; Roman I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):551-4. PubMed ID: 12750675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Herrmann W; Ozcan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 12750673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of food simulants on porcelain-composite bonding.
    Akova T; Ozkomur A; Aytutuldu N; Toroglu MS
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1369-72. PubMed ID: 17215036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface.
    Kim JT; Cho SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19167534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the 'selective' removal of orthodontic resin adhesive.
    Banerjee A; Paolinelis G; Socker M; McDonald F; Watson TF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 18821993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An investigation into the bonding of orthodontic attachments to porcelain.
    Larmour CJ; Bateman G; Stirrups DR
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 16199411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.
    Eminkahyagil N; Arman A; Cetinşahin A; Karabulut E
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 16539561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Polishing of dental porcelain by polycrystalline diamond.
    Nakamura Y; Sato H; Ohtsuka M; Hojo S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 21084740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.
    Turssi CP; Saad JR; Duarte SL; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun; 13(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 11763949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of porcelain surface conditioning on bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Ajlouni R; Bishara SE; Oonsombat C; Soliman M; Laffoon J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):858-64. PubMed ID: 16283817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with novel non-orthodontic methods for residual adhesive removal.
    Andrews J; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 27468590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.