These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16540072)
1. Injury potential of a three-year-old Hybrid III dummy in forward and rearward facing positions under CMVSS 208 testing conditions. Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Wang Q; Howard A Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):786-800. PubMed ID: 16540072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes. Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1880-92. PubMed ID: 19068290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A numerical investigation into the effect of CRS misuse on the injury potential of children in frontal and side impact crashes. Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Snowdon A; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F; Baggio D Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1438-50. PubMed ID: 21545877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes. Belwadi A; Sarfare S; Tushak S; Maheshwari J; Menon S Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S143-S144. PubMed ID: 31725355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Load limiting behavior in CRS tether anchors as a method to mitigate head and neck injuries sustained by children in frontal crash. Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Tot M; Zhang W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F; Mizuno K Traffic Inj Prev; 2008; 9(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 18570147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A modified crash brace position for aircraft passengers. Brownson P; Wallace WA; Anton DJ Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Oct; 69(10):975-8. PubMed ID: 9773899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model. Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Casting technique and restraint choice influence child safety during transport of body casted children subjected to a simulated frontal MVA. Zielinski J; Oliver G; Sybesma J; Walter N; Atkinson P J Trauma; 2009 Jun; 66(6):1653-65. PubMed ID: 19509628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical injury evaluation of laminated side door windows and sunroof during rollover accidents. Sances A; Kumaresan S; Carlin F; Friedman K; Meyer S Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():241-4. PubMed ID: 12724901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multivariate head injury threshold measures for various sized children seated behind vehicle seats in rear impacts. Saczalski K; Sances A; Kumaresan S; Pozzi M; Saczalski T; Burton JL; Lewis P Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():381-6. PubMed ID: 15133988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of occupant anthropometry during frontal collisions. Frieder R; Kumar S; Sances A Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():75-80. PubMed ID: 17487060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome--part II: biomechanical study. Hault-Dubrulle A; Robache F; Drazetic P; Guillemot H; Morvan H Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jan; 43(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 21094299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of cervical spine injury risk for the 6-year-old child in frontal crashes. Sherwood CP; Shaw CG; Van Rooij L; Kent RW; Crandall JR; Orzechowski KM; Eichelberger MR; Kallieris D Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 14522645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled. Viano DC; Parenteau CS Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests. Croft AC; Philippens MM Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions. Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crash analysis of lower extremity injuries in children restrained in forward-facing car seats during front and rear impacts. Bennett TD; Kaufman R; Schiff M; Mock C; Quan L J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):592-7. PubMed ID: 16966993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative performance of rearward and forward-facing child restraint systems with common use errors: Effect on crash injury risk for a 1-year-old occupant. Whyte T; Kent N; Bilston LE; Brown J Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 35044289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variations in occupant response with seat belt slack and anchor location during moderate frontal impacts. Siegmund GP; Chimich DD; Heinrichs BE; DeMarco AL; Brault JR Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15823873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]