These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16540437)

  • 1. Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16540437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Co-contraction recruitment and spinal load during isometric trunk flexion and extension.
    Granata KP; Lee PE; Franklin TC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Dec; 20(10):1029-37. PubMed ID: 16154249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.
    Granata KR; Bennett BC
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 16435695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active trunk stiffness during voluntary isometric flexion and extension exertions.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP; Moorhouse KM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 17315847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trunk posture and spinal stability.
    Granata KP; Wilson SE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Oct; 16(8):650-9. PubMed ID: 11535346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The in vivo dynamic response of the spine to perturbations causing rapid flexion: effects of pre-load and step input magnitude.
    Krajcarski SR; Potvin JR; Chiang J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 10619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trunk response and stability in standing under sagittal-symmetric pull-push forces at different orientations, elevations and magnitudes.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():166-174. PubMed ID: 29089111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Torque and EMG in rotation extension of the torso from pre-rotated and flexed postures.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):920-31. PubMed ID: 16782246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture.
    Cholewicki J; Panjabi MM; Khachatryan A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(19):2207-12. PubMed ID: 9346140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creep and fatigue development in the low back in static flexion.
    Shin G; D'Souza C; Liu YH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):1873-8. PubMed ID: 19644340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trunk muscle co-contraction increases during fatiguing, isometric, lateral bend exertions. Possible implications for spine stability.
    Potvin JR; O'Brien PR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):774-80; discussion 781. PubMed ID: 9563107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trunk strength, muscle activity and spinal loads in maximum isometric flexion and extension exertions: a combined in vivo-computational study.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2228-35. PubMed ID: 23871523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
    Vera-Garcia FJ; Brown SH; Gray JR; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 16442677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability.
    Granata KP; Orishimo KF
    J Biomech; 2001 Sep; 34(9):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11506782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(11):1398-404. PubMed ID: 10828922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of changes in orientation and position of external loads on trunk muscle activity and kinematics in upright standing.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Jun; 24(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 24650795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of trunk muscle co-contraction on spinal curvature during sitting for desk work.
    Watanabe S; Eguchi A; Kobara K; Ishida H
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 47(6):273-8. PubMed ID: 17918502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.