96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16540867)
1. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results.
Iizuka H; Iizuka Y; Nakagawa Y; Nakajima T; Toda N; Shimegi A; Tsutsumi S; Takagishi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):644-7. PubMed ID: 16540867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is high T-1 slope a significant risk factor for developing interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty? A retrospective cohort study.
Oichi T; Oshima Y; Oka H; Taniguchi Y; Chikuda H; Matsubayashi Y; Takeshita K; Tanaka S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 28937936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can C3 Laminectomy Reduce Interlaminar Bony Fusion and Preserve the Range of Motion After Cervical Laminoplasty?
Lee DH; Cho JH; Hwang CJ; Lee CS; Cho SK; Ha JK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):1884-1890. PubMed ID: 27517513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-Year Long-term Results of Modified Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty With C3 Laminectomy Preserving the Semispinalis Cervicis Inserted Into the Axis Compared With Those of Conventional Cervical Laminoplasty.
Kudo H; Takeuchi K; Wada K; Kumagai G; Tanaka S; Asari T; Araki R; Yokoyama T; Ishibashi Y
Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Apr; 34(3):E147-E153. PubMed ID: 32941312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. C1-C2 posterior fusion in growing patients: long-term follow-up.
Parisini P; Di Silvestre M; Greggi T; Bianchi G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):566-72; discussion 572. PubMed ID: 12642763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of wedge-shaped resection of the posterior bony arch on postoperative outcomes after open door laminoplasty in the cervical spine: a 2-year follow-up study.
Lee GW; Suh BG; Yeom JS; Ryu SM; Ahn MW
Spine J; 2017 Sep; 17(9):1230-1237. PubMed ID: 28458066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiography results of mini-plate fixation compared to suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: A five-year follow-up study.
Chen H; Deng Y; Li T; Gong Q; Song Y; Liu H
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():188-95. PubMed ID: 26379265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy resulting from adjacent-segment disease in patients with previous anterior cervical decompression and fusion.
Matsumoto M; Nojiri K; Chiba K; Toyama Y; Fukui Y; Kamata M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1332-7. PubMed ID: 16721295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.
Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Hida T; Ito Z; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.
Suk KS; Kim KT; Lee JH; Lee SH; Lim YJ; Kim JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E656-60. PubMed ID: 17978640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sagittal range of motion after extensive cervical fusion.
Park MS; Mesfin A; Stoker GE; Song KS; Kennedy C; Riew KD
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 24021620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
Shiraishi T; Fukuda K; Yato Y; Nakamura M; Ikegami T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy caused by soft disc herniation: a prospective multicenter study.
Koakutsu T; Morozumi N; Ishii Y; Kasama F; Sato T; Tanaka Y; Kokubun S; Yamazaki S
J Orthop Sci; 2010 Jan; 15(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 20151254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.
Hyun SJ; Riew KD; Rhim SC
Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23218824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical range of motion and alignment after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis.
Takeuchi K; Yokoyama T; Ono A; Numasawa T; Wada K; Kumagai G; Ito J; Ueyama K; Toh S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Dec; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18046169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Multicenter Observational Study on the Postoperative Outcomes of C3 Laminectomy in Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty.
Nakajima K; Nakamoto H; Kato S; Doi T; Matsubayashi Y; Taniguchi Y; Yoshida Y; Kawamura N; Nakarai H; Higashikawa A; Tozawa K; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Iizuka M; Ono T; Shirokoshi T; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
Clin Spine Surg; 2021 May; 34(4):146-152. PubMed ID: 33086255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Lee CK; Shin DA; Yi S; Kim KN; Shin HC; Yoon DH; Ha Y
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26431070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.
Kang KC; Lee CS; Han JH; Chung SS
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
