These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16541349)
21. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. Ha JW; Cho SY; Shim WH; Chung N; Jang Y; Lee HM; Choe KO; Chung WJ; Choi SH; Yoo KJ; Kang MS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1055-9. PubMed ID: 10587146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Serial angiographic follow-up of grafts one year and five years after coronary artery bypass surgery. Cho KR; Kim JS; Choi JS; Kim KB Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 16439151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Onuma Y; Tanabe K; Chihara R; Yamamoto H; Miura Y; Kigawa I; Fukuda S; Miyairi T; Nakajima H; Hara K Am Heart J; 2007 Sep; 154(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 17719300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Stein PD; Beemath A; Skaf E; Kayali F; Janjua M; Alesh I; Olson RE Am J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 96(12):1669-73. PubMed ID: 16360355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings. Heye T; Kauczor HU; Szabo G; Hosch W Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 23908242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Willmann JK; Mayer D; Banyai M; Desbiolles LM; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Weishaupt D Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 14595148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Widimsky P; Straka Z; Stros P; Jirasek K; Dvorak J; Votava J; Lisa L; Budesinsky T; Kolesar M; Vanek T; Brucek P Circulation; 2004 Nov; 110(22):3418-23. PubMed ID: 15557371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bypass graft and native postanastomotic coronary artery patency: assessment with computed tomography. Andreini D; Pontone G; Ballerini G; Bertella E; Nobili E; Parolari A; Pepi M Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 17462377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ko YG; Choi DH; Jang YS; Chung NS; Shim WH; Cho SY; Yoo KJ; Chang BC; Choi BW Yonsei Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 12833581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. Sahiner L; Canpolat U; Yorgun H; Hazrolan T; Karçaaltncaba M; Sunman H; Kaya EB; Aytemir K; Oto A J Investig Med; 2012 Dec; 60(8):1180-5. PubMed ID: 23076163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Khot UN; Friedman DT; Pettersson G; Smedira NG; Li J; Ellis SG Circulation; 2004 May; 109(17):2086-91. PubMed ID: 15123539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multidetector computed tomography and electron-beam tomography. Piers LH; Dorgelo J; Tio RA; Jessurun GA; Oudkerk M; Zijlstra F Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005 Aug; 21(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16047127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do radial-artery grafts have a superior 1-year patency to saphenous-vein grafts? Tatoulis J Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2005 Mar; 2(3):126-7. PubMed ID: 16265451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Nieman K; Pattynama PM; Rensing BJ; Van Geuns RJ; De Feyter PJ Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 14657312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of coronary bypass graft occlusion and stenosis with 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography. Oncel D; Oncel G; Tastan A; Tamci B Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):988-96. PubMed ID: 17957513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Ropers D; Pohle FK; Kuettner A; Pflederer T; Anders K; Daniel WG; Bautz W; Baum U; Achenbach S Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(22):2334-41; quiz 2334. PubMed ID: 17088461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [MR angiography and determination of the flow reserve after minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery of the left internal mammary artery in comparison to multirow CT]. Stauder NI; Stauder H; Fenchel M; Küttner A; Kramer U; Scheule AM; Claussen CD; Miller S Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1094-102. PubMed ID: 16021541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]