261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16541375)
1. The effect of crank rate on physiological responses and exercise efficiency using a range of submaximal workloads during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 27(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 16541375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Chapman ML; Hazlehurst KE; Goss-Sampson MA
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 17337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spontaneously chosen crank rate variations in submaximal arm exercise with inexperienced subjects. Effects on cardiorespiratory and efficiency parameters.
Marais G; Dupont L; Maillet M; Weissland T; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Int J Sports Med; 2002 Feb; 23(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11842359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry.
Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A
J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Submaximal arm crank ergometry: Effects of crank axis positioning on mechanical efficiency, physiological strain and perceived discomfort.
van Drongelen S; Maas JC; Scheel-Sailer A; Van Der Woude LH
J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 19205993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of step and ramp type protocols on the attainment of peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Drake D; Price MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2004 Nov; 25(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 15532006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of crank rate on peak oxygen consumption during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Price MJ; Doherty M
J Sports Sci; 2001 Dec; 19(12):955-60. PubMed ID: 11820689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of ramp rate on VO2peak and "excess" VO2 during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Amaral I; Doherty M; Price MJ; Jones AM
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Aug; 27(8):610-6. PubMed ID: 16874587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
J Sports Sci; 2007 Apr; 25(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 17454538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise.
Price MJ; Campbell IG
Int J Sports Med; 1999 Oct; 20(7):457-63. PubMed ID: 10551341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metabolic and heart rate responses to submaximal arm lever and arm crank ergometry.
Gangelhoff J; Cordain L; Tucker A; Sockler J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 3341886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physiological comparison of synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling.
Dallmeijer AJ; Ottjes L; de Waardt E; van der Woude LH
Int J Sports Med; 2004 Nov; 25(8):622-6. PubMed ID: 15532007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of previous dynamic arm exercise on power output during repeated maximal sprint cycling.
Bogdanis GC; Nevill ME; Lakomy HK
J Sports Sci; 1994 Aug; 12(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 7932946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of glucose ingestion on endurance upper-body exercise and performance.
Spendiff O; Campbell IG
Int J Sports Med; 2002 Feb; 23(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 11842363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of stage duration on physiological variables commonly used to determine maximum aerobic performance during cycle ergometry.
Roffey DM; Byrne NM; Hills AP
J Sports Sci; 2007 Oct; 25(12):1325-35. PubMed ID: 17786685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of a fast ramp rate on peak cardiopulmonary parameters during arm crank ergometry.
Castro RR; Pedrosa S; Chabalgoity F; Sousa EB; Nobrega AC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2010 Nov; 30(6):420-5. PubMed ID: 20718807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in cardiorespiratory responses during and after arm crank and cycle exercise.
Louhevaara V; Sovijärvi A; Ilmarinen J; Teräslinna P
Acta Physiol Scand; 1990 Feb; 138(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 2316376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Circulatory and metabolic responses of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry.
Sedlock DA; Knowlton RG; Fitzgerald PI
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Feb; 71(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2302053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ventilatory threshold and work efficiency during exercise on a cycle and rowing ergometer.
Bunc V; Leso J
J Sports Sci; 1993 Feb; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8450585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry.
Schrieks IC; Barnes MJ; Hodges LD
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jul; 31(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 21672142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
