BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16541448)

  • 1. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
    Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
    Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
    Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.
    Layfield LJ; Wax TD; Lee JG; Cotton PB
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7846997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
    Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: a study of 74 cases.
    de Peralta-Venturina MN; Wong DK; Purslow MJ; Kini SR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):334-48. PubMed ID: 8725136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
    Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
    Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical utility of stent cytology for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
    Devereaux BM; Fogel EL; Bucksot L; Shelly LA; Lehman GA; Sherman S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1028-31. PubMed ID: 12809824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bile cytology. Diagnostic role in the management of biliary obstruction.
    Nilsson B; Wee A; Yap I
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 7631549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Endoscopic cytodiagnosis of the pancreas and bile ducts].
    Witte S; Langer J
    Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Sep; 86(9):449-53. PubMed ID: 1943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brushing cytology in biliary tract obstruction.
    Rupp M; Hawthorne CM; Ehya H
    Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 2321454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical value of K-ras codon 12 analysis and endobiliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignant extrahepatic bile duct stenosis.
    Sturm PD; Rauws EA; Hruban RH; Caspers E; Ramsoekh TB; Huibregtse K; Noorduyn LA; Offerhaus GJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Mar; 5(3):629-35. PubMed ID: 10100716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
    Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of Ki-ras mutation analysis in the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatobiliary neoplasma.
    Dillon DA; Johnson CC; Topazian MD; Tallini G; Rimm DL; Costa JC
    Cancer J; 2000; 6(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 11079168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
    Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of simpson atherectomy catheter biopsy in detecting pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
    Kaufman D; Widlus D; Lazinger M; Didolkar M; Kumar D; Dutta SK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Apr; 96(4):1054-8. PubMed ID: 11316146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
    Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.
    Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usefulness of bile cytology in the diagnostic management of patients with biliary tract obstruction.
    Cobb CJ; Floyd WN
    Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 2984868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.