368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16543593)
1. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyp detection at CT colonography: inadequate primary 3D endoluminal reference standard precludes meaningful comparison.
Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):316-7. PubMed ID: 17581913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 16498097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography.
Suzuki K; Yoshida H; Näppi J; Armato SG; Dachman AH
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703. PubMed ID: 18383691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]