167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16544861)
1. Recommended practices for sponge, sharps, and instrument counts.
AORN Recommended Practices Committee
AORN J; 2006 Feb; 83(2):418, 421-6, 429-33. PubMed ID: 16544861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommended practices. Sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. AORN Technical Practices Coordinating Committee.
AORN J; 1990 Mar; 51(3):838, 840-2; 844. PubMed ID: 2317034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of a numbered surgical sponge product.
Pelter MM; Stephens KE; Loranger D
AORN J; 2007 May; 85(5):931-6, 938-40. PubMed ID: 17499056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. Association of Operating Room Nurses.
AORN J; 1995 Feb; 61(2):404, 406, 408-11. PubMed ID: 7717703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses.
AORN J; 1999 Dec; 70(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 10635432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Counting swabs.
Hughes C
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2005 Oct; 15(10):407. PubMed ID: 16252464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Technology to assist in the prevention of retained surgical items.
Allen SL
AORN J; 2012 Jun; 95(6):684-5. PubMed ID: 22633375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Counting for patient safety.
Watson DS
AORN J; 2006 Aug; 84(2):273-5. PubMed ID: 16927590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical counts can be risky business!
Porteous J
Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2004 Dec; 22(4):6-8, 10, 12. PubMed ID: 15709630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Counting instruments and sponges.
Beyea SC
AORN J; 2003 Aug; 78(2):290, 293-4. PubMed ID: 12940428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical equipment and materials left in patients.
Brown J; Feather D
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2005 Jun; 15(6):259-62, 264-5. PubMed ID: 15974227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditing and improving the sponge count process.
Farrell V; Higbie V; Cleveland S
OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12661500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Counts, documentation revisited.
Murphy EK
AORN J; 1991 Oct; 54(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 1952910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Did we forget something?
AORN J; 2010 May; 91(5):644-583. PubMed ID: 20451008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient care. The right count.
Dalton A
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):32, 34. PubMed ID: 16128316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety.
Riley R; Manias E; Polglase A
Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Oct; 15(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 17074876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The countdown to safety.
Girard NJ
AORN J; 2004 Mar; 79(3):575-6. PubMed ID: 15074515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond setup: preference cards as a tool for managing in the OR.
OR Manager; 2002 Aug; 18(8):1, 8-11. PubMed ID: 12219519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AORN updates recommended practices.
OR Manager; 2008 Jun; 24(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 18655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]