These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16545294)

  • 1. [How are the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations to be classified?].
    Marzo-Castillejo M; Alonso-Coello P; Rotaeche del Campo R
    Aten Primaria; 2006 Jan; 37(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16545294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [GRADE system: classification of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation].
    Aguayo-Albasini JL; Flores-Pastor B; Soria-Aledo V
    Cir Esp; 2014 Feb; 92(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The GRADE system for classification of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations in clinical guideline reports.
    Oñate-Ocaña LF; Ochoa-Carrillo FJ
    Cir Cir; 2009; 77(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 19944034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SORT: the strength-of-recommendation taxonomy.
    Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 15666558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SORT: Strength of recommendation taxonomy.
    Weiss BD
    Fam Med; 2004 Feb; 36(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 14872363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of uniformity in levels of evidence and recommendation grades in surgical oncology guidelines.
    In H; Greenberg CC
    World J Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(10):2273-5. PubMed ID: 22543721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management
    Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):874-7. PubMed ID: 15342869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Term Breech Trial.
    Berard V
    Birth; 2003 Mar; 30(1):72-3. PubMed ID: 12581045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Creating a hierarchy of scientific knowledge: the GRADE system].
    Quereda Rodríguez-Navarro C; Barrio Lucia V; García López F
    Nefrologia; 2009; 29(6 Suppl):7-14. PubMed ID: 20221217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature.
    Ebell MH; Siwek J; Weiss BD; Woolf SH; Susman JL; Ewigman B; Bowman M
    J Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 53(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 14764293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How often is strength of recommendation indicated in guidelines? Analysis of the Yale Guideline Recommendation Corpus.
    Hussain T; Michel G; Shiffman RN
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():984. PubMed ID: 18998809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants Used to Justify the Strength of Recommendations among Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Shin ES; Jang JE; Yeon JY; Kim DS; Chang SG; Lee YS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(8):e79. PubMed ID: 29441759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
    Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins.
    Wright JD; Pawar N; Gonzalez JSR; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Simpson LL; Charles AS; D'Alton ME; Herzog TJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 118(3):505-512. PubMed ID: 21826038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of evidence underlying guidelines by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
    Brock CO; Blackwell SC; Chauhan SP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):223.e1-223.e10. PubMed ID: 32835718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. For readers (stroke specialists and general practitioners) of the Japanese guidelines for the management of stroke. Preface.
    Shinohara Y
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2011; 20(4 Suppl):S1-6. PubMed ID: 21835351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and strength of evidence of the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines.
    Khan AR; Khan S; Zimmerman V; Baddour LM; Tleyjeh IM
    Clin Infect Dis; 2010 Nov; 51(10):1147-56. PubMed ID: 20946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature.
    Ebell MH; Siwek J; Weiss BD; Woolf SH; Susman J; Ewigman B; Bowman M
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2004; 17(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15014055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is there evidence in evidence-based medicine? A comparison of common gradation systems and critical evaluation].
    Lüring C; Koester B; Grifka J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 17187329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.