465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16545338)
1. Manual materials handling in mining: the effect of rod heights and foot positions when lifting "in-the-hole" drill rods.
Plamondon A; Delisle A; Trimble K; Desjardins P; Rickwood T
Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):709-18. PubMed ID: 16545338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of release height on center of pressure and trunk muscle response following sudden release of stoop lifting tasks.
Chow DH; Cheng AC; Holmes AD; Evans JH
Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 14559422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted?
Kingma I; Faber GS; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
Phys Ther; 2006 Aug; 86(8):1091-105. PubMed ID: 16879043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?
Davis K; Marras W
Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1031-46. PubMed ID: 16147419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of squat lift training and free weight muscle training on maximum lifting load and isolinetic peak torque of young adults without impairments.
Yeung SS; Ng GY
Phys Ther; 2000 Jun; 80(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10842410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading.
Hoozemans MJ; Kingma I; de Vries WH; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2008 Jul; 51(7):1053-63. PubMed ID: 18568964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
Shin G; Mirka G
Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical analysis of anterior load carriage.
Anderson AM; Meador KA; McClure LR; Makrozahopoulos D; Brooks DJ; Mirka GA
Ergonomics; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2104-17. PubMed ID: 17852376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of work experience, lift frequency and exposure duration on low back muscle oxygenation.
Yang G; Chany AM; Parakkat J; Burr D; Marras WS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16996665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
