BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16546676)

  • 1. Three-dimensional maximum a posteriori (MAP) imaging with radiopharmaceuticals labeled with three Cu radionuclides.
    Ruangma A; Bai B; Lewis JS; Sun X; Welch MJ; Leahy R; Laforest R
    Nucl Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 16546676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y.
    Vandenberghe S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 16479243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality with non-standard nuclides in PET.
    Laforest R; Liu X
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Jun; 52(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 18043539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
    Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Slump CH; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 20237025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative small animal PET imaging with nonconventional nuclides.
    Liu X; Laforest R
    Nucl Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 36(5):551-9. PubMed ID: 19520296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical dynamic image reconstruction in state-of-the-art high-resolution PET.
    Rahmim A; Cheng JC; Blinder S; Camborde ML; Sossi V
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4887-912. PubMed ID: 16204879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between MAP and postprocessed ML for image reconstruction in emission tomography when anatomical knowledge is available.
    Nuyts J; Baete K; Bequé D; Dupont P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 15889553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the imaged-object distance with a stationary high-spatial-resolution scintillation camera.
    Uzunov N; Bello M; Boccaccio P; Moschini G; Bollini D; de Notaristefani F
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):N199-204. PubMed ID: 16625030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography.
    Thomas MD; Bailey DL; Livieratos L
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):N187-94. PubMed ID: 16030376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.
    Vandervoort E; Sossi V
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 18334435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of image-space resolution modeling for studies with the high-resolution research tomograph.
    Sureau FC; Reader AJ; Comtat C; Leroy C; Ribeiro MJ; Buvat I; Trébossen R
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 18511844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cascade removal and microPET imaging with 76Br.
    Laforest R; Liu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1503-31. PubMed ID: 19229093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner.
    Schäfers KP; Reader AJ; Kriens M; Knoess C; Schober O; Schäfers M
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 15937311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.
    Wang Y; Seidel J; Tsui BM; Vaquero JJ; Pomper MG
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1891-900. PubMed ID: 17079824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
    Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.
    Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production, processing and small animal PET imaging of titanium-45.
    Vāvere AL; Laforest R; Welch MJ
    Nucl Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 15721756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of the injected activity in dynamic 3D PET: a generalized approach using patient-specific NECs as demonstrated by a series of 15O-H2O scans.
    Walker MD; Matthews JC; Asselin MC; Saleem A; Dickinson C; Charnley N; Julyan PJ; Price PM; Jones T
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1409-17. PubMed ID: 19690021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.
    Brasse D; Kinahan PE; Lartizien C; Comtat C; Casey M; Michel C
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 15872361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MicroPET reconstruction with random coincidence correction via a joint Poisson model.
    Chen TB; Chen JC; Lu HH; Liu RS
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 17644463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.