333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16547323)
1. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Gaskin BJ; Jayusundera T; Donaldson M; Gamble GD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 16547323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.
Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN; Cheung CY; Qiu Q; Liu S; Xu G; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19969364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study.
Harasymowycz PJ; Papamatheakis DG; Fansi AK; Gresset J; Lesk MR
Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2164-71. PubMed ID: 16325710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.
Kara-José AC; Melo LAS; Esporcatte BLB; Endo ATNH; Leite MT; Tavares IM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181428. PubMed ID: 28727836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 19969361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measures in glaucoma.
Iester M; Mikelberg FS; Swindale NV; Drance SM
Can J Ophthalmol; 1997 Oct; 32(6):382-8. PubMed ID: 9363342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.
Spaeth GL; Henderer J; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Katz LJ; Myers J; Rhee D; Steinmann W
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():181-5; discussion 185-6. PubMed ID: 12545692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters to glaucomatous progression in disc photographs.
Saarela V; Falck A; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 20346079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
Ford BA; Artes PH; McCormick TA; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology; 2003 Jun; 110(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12799239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regression analysis of ranked segment parameters for optic nerve head classification: a pilot study.
Cubbidge RP; Hosking SL; Hilton EJ; Gibson JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 17324210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reversal of optic disc cupping after glaucoma surgery analyzed with a scanning laser tomograph.
Lesk MR; Spaeth GL; Azuara-Blanco A; Araujo SV; Katz LJ; Terebuh AK; Wilson RP; Moster MR; Schmidt CM
Ophthalmology; 1999 May; 106(5):1013-8. PubMed ID: 10328406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.
Zangwill LM; Jain S; Racette L; Ernstrom KB; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2653-60. PubMed ID: 17525196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Abdul Majid AS; Kwag JH; Jung SH; Yim HB; Kim YD; Kang KD
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 20185941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
