176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16548992)
1. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears.
Alves VA; Castelo A; Filho AL; Vianna MR; Taromaru E; Namiyama G; Lorincz A; Dores GB;
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 16548993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a low priced liquid-based method for cervical cytology in 632 women referred for colposcopy after a positive Pap smear.
van Hemel BM; Buikema HJ; Groen H; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Aug; 37(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 19373881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath liquid-based cytology system.
Narine N; Young W
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 17578516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of AutoPap system location-guided screening in the evaluation of cervical cytology smears.
Stevens MW; Milne AJ; Parkinson IH; Nespolon WW; Fazzalari NL; Arora N; Dodd TJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 15282720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?
Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
Park J; Jung EH; Kim C; Choi YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
Sykes PH; Harker DY; Miller A; Whitehead M; Neal H; Wells JE; Peddie D
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid-based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high-grade dyskaryosis?
Blanks RG; Kelly RS
Cytopathology; 2010 Dec; 21(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 20955376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
